Marriage of London
Michele L. London (Michele) appeals from a postjudgment order entered on May 11, 2009, modifying a 2003 judgment that required her former husband, respondent Gary H. London (Gary), to pay her spousal support.[1] Michele and Gary were married almost 25 years and had no minor children at the time of judgment. In the 2009 order modifying the judgment, the trial court reduced spousal support by $1,300 per month, after finding Michele's income had increased by $1,500 per month.
On appeal, Michele claims the court erroneously failed to consider all of the required statutory factors for modification of spousal support, including Gary's ability to pay. (Fam. Code, § 4320; all statutory references are to the Family Code unless noted.) We conclude the court properly considered the relevant section 4320 factors and did not abuse its discretion in determining a material change in circumstances had occurred, justifying a reduction in spousal support.
Comments on Marriage of London