Quadri v. Alkayali
The court entered judgment in favor of plaintiffs and cross-defendants Akram Quadri and Fatma Boukhari, who are married to each other (individual plaintiffs), and NeoCell Corporation against defendants and cross-complainants Ahmad Alkayali (Alkayali) and Terri Alkayali, finding the individual plaintiffs owned all the shares in NeoCell and defendants owned none. The judgment also included a permanent injunction barring defendants from the NeoCell premises.
Defendants' appeal raises several issues. They claim the court erred by denying them a jury trial on the declaratory relief causes of action as to stock ownership, the statement of decision was insufficient, the judgment is not supported by substantial evidence, the injunction should not have issued, and plaintiffs are barred from recovering by unclean hands. Finding none of these arguments meritorious, we affirm.
Comments on Quadri v. Alkayali