PEOPLE v. LEIVA
Defendant Jose Leiva appeals from judgments entered following separate findings that he violated the terms and conditions of his grant of probation.[1] His principal contention is the trial court lacked jurisdiction to revoke probation on either occasion because probation had expired by operation of law. He also asserts there is insufficient evidence to support the court's findings and the court considered inadmissible evidence. We conclude that defendant's claims lack merit and affirm.
Comments on PEOPLE v. LEIVA