Mink v. Encina Veterinary Clinic
Plaintiff Perri Mink appeals the orders of the trial court sustaining without leave to amend the demurrers of defendants Encina Veterinary Clinic, Inc., Roger Johnson, Peter Nurre, Kathy Shuttlesworth, and Angela Linvill (collectively referred to as Encina), and Kevin W. Bissonnette and Mobile Animal Surgery Services (collectively referred to as Bissonnette). The court sustained the demurrers on the grounds that her fourth amended complaint fails to adequately state a cause of action and includes claims that are barred by the statute of limitations. We affirm the court's orders and the judgments of dismissal.
Comments on Mink v. Encina Veterinary Clinic