P. v. Baytop
Clarence Baytop (appellant) appeals from a judgment of conviction entered after he pleaded no contest to possessing a controlled substance (Health & Saf. Code, § 11350, subd. (a)). He contends the trial court: (1) erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence; and (2) should have awarded him additional sentencing credits under Penal Code section 4019.[1] We reject the contentions and affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Baytop