KAREN THOMAS v. ROBERT A. GUSTAFSON
Trial court properly considered beneficiary's assets in determining whether trustee abused discretion by refusing to invade principal of trust for beneficiary's support. Trial court erred in dividing trustee's fees and costs between income and principal of trust; where litigation primarily concerned the principal, fees and costs must be paid from that principal. Trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying request for payment from trust of attorney fees incurred by petitioner who unsuccessfully sought to invade trust principal for support of beneficiary.
Comments on KAREN THOMAS v. ROBERT A. GUSTAFSON