P. v. Spencer
This appeal raises two wrinkles on a familiar issue: entitlement to additional Penal Code section 4019[1] credits. In this case, judgment was final prior to the effective date of an amendment of section 4019,[2] but defendant and appellant Timothy David Spence contends equal protection requires he receive additional credits, and that the applicable standard of scrutiny is strict scrutiny. We affirm.
Comments on P. v. Spencer