legal news


Register | Forgot Password

KREEGER v. WANLAND
Where defendant who prevailed in a car accident--related negligence suit failed in subsequent malicious prosecution action alleging plaintiff lacked probable cause to claim defendant negligently caused the accident. The plaintiff later brought a malicious prosecution action against defendant alleging her malicious prosecution claim had lacked basis. The court properly denied defendant's anti-SLAPP motion as to plaintiff's malicious prosecution claim where--even though defendant had clearly engaged in protected activity when pursuing her malicious prosecution claim--plaintiff demonstrated probability of being able to establish that defendant at time of filing malicious prosecution suit did not have probable cause to believe that plaintiff had lacked probable cause for believing defendant was liable. Plaintiff is not entitled to sanctions for frivolous appeal unless all reasonable attorneys would agree appeal was totally without merit.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale