legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Chairenza
possession of a controlled substance for sale. The trial court suspended imposition of sentence and placed Appellant on formal probation. Appellant contends that by imposing a probation revocation fine and certain penalty assessments pursuant to Government Code sections 70372 and 76104.6, the trial court violated the constitutional prohibition against ex post facto laws. Court order the judgment modified to strike the probation revocation fine and remand for recomputation of the penalty assessments. In all other respects, court affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale