Choi v. Choi
A disputes arose about work quality, change orders and resulting cost increases, and delays in completion, resulting in others being hired to complete the work. Plaintiff sued the sisters for breach of contract and related claims and the sisters cross-complained. After a court trial, the court found that the agreements were unenforceable because at the time they were made Defendant had not authorized Michelle to act as her agent and a later purported retroactive written authorization was too unreliable to be effective.
Comments on Choi v. Choi