legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re J.B.
J.M., the minor, was born to 15-year-old parents, who had themselves been dependents of the juvenile court. The minor was detained because mother would not feed or attend to the infant in the hospital after giving birth, and both parents’ families had lengthy histories with the San Bernardino County Children and Family Services (CFS) agency. The juvenile court sustained a petition alleging neglect based on the parents’ lack of parenting skills or support system, psychological issues, father’s delinquency wardship based on his sexual abuse of his younger sibling, and the fact both parents had been dependent children themselves, coming from dysfunctional families. The minor was removed from the parents’ custody and placed in foster care at the dispositional hearing, where the parents were ordered to participate in reunification services which included visitation two times per week. Mother appealed the judgment.
On appeal, mother asserts: (1) there is insufficient evidence to support the finding of jurisdiction under Welfare and Institutions Code[1] section 300, subdivision (b); and (2) the dispositional order removing the minor from mother’s custody was not supported by clear and convincing evidence. We affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale