Daniel A. v. Superior Court
Petitioner is the father of two-year-old child filed this writ petition pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 38.1 challenging an order setting a permanency planning hearing as to the children.Father contends that the juvenile court erred in finding that reasonable services had been provided and in denying request for an additional six months of reunification services. Court reject Father's challenge and deny his petition.
Comments on Daniel A. v. Superior Court