Memon v. Schultz
Appellant, Noor Mohamed Memon, filed a complaint for fraud against multiple defendants including respondents, the Lemoore Police Department, Lemoore Chief of Police Jeff Law, District Attorney Ronald Calhoun, and defense attorney Laurence Meyer. Appellant alleged that the defendants committed fraud in convicting his son, Jonathon Dugan, of criminal charges and sending Dugan to prison. Appellant requested that Dugan’s conviction be overturned, all of Dugan’s records be sealed, and that all civil and constitutional rights be restored to Dugan.
Through demurrers, respondents argued the complaint should be dismissed for various reasons, including that: the complaint was barred by the statute of limitations; appellant did not have an actual and substantial interest in the subject matter of the action; and appellant did not comply with the Government Claims Act. In addition to his demurrer, Meyer filed a special motion to strike the complaint. (Code Civ. Proc., § 425.16.)
The trial court sustained the demurrers without leave to amend and granted Meyer’s motion. Appellant has provided neither argument nor citation to relevant authority regarding why these orders should be reversed. Moreover, respondents’ demurrers were properly sustained. Accordingly, the judgment will be affirmed.
Comments on Memon v. Schultz