In re D.F.
Donovan F. (father) appeals from the juvenile court’s exit order for monitored visitation between him and his two children, son D.F. and daughter L.F. Father contends that the court erred in requiring his weekly visits to be monitored because the evidence did not support a need for monitoring, and besides that, the court undermined its order for weekly visits by requiring a monitor when none was consistently available. Additionally, father asserts the court erred when it failed to specify a minimum duration for each visit. We affirm.
Comments on In re D.F.