In re Aaliyah H.
Megan M., mother of the now 21-month-old minor, appeals from the judgment (disposition orders) declaring the minor a dependent child, denying her services, and placing the minor out of the home. ( ADDIN BA xc <@st> xl 36 s FUKEKP000001 xpl 1 l "Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 300, 358, 360" Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 300, 358, 360.)[1] Appellant argues the juvenile court erred in finding jurisdiction because the Sacramento County Department of Health and Human Services (Department) failed to show the minor was currently at risk of suffering physical harm or abuse. Appellant also argues the disposition finding that removal was required and the order bypassing her services for her were not supported by substantial evidence. In a review hearing subsequent to the judgment, the juvenile court returned the minor to parental custody and ordered family maintenance services for both parents. Several months thereafter, the court terminated the dependency awarding joint custody to both parents.[2] We affirm the juvenile court’s exercise of jurisdiction and conclude the dispositional issues are now moot.
Comments on In re Aaliyah H.