legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Timothy R. v,. Super. Ct.
At the 18-month review hearing (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.22, subd. (a); Cal. Rules of Court, rule 5.720)[1] in the dependency case of four-year old M.R. (son), the trial court declined to return son to the custody of his parents. The court instead terminated reunification services and set a hearing under section 366.26 to consider the termination of parental rights. Timothy R. (father) challenges the court’s orders by petition for writ of mandate. (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.452.) Because the court’s orders are supported by substantial evidence, we deny father’s petition.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale