P. v. Brown
Anthony Dashaun Brown appeals from a conviction for five counts of resisting an executive officer. He contends (1) this court should conduct an independent review of the in camera Pitchess[1] hearing; (2) the trial court erred in not instructing the jury with the definition of “unlawful use of force or violenceâ€; (3) the trial court erred when it admitted a recorded 911 call; (4) the trial court erred in admitting evidence that appellant was subject to a warrant at the time of his arrest; and (5) the trial court miscalculated his presentence conduct credits under Penal Code section 4019.[2] Respondent does not object to our independent review of the Pitchess hearing but disagrees with appellant’s other contentions. Additionally, respondent contends that the court should amend the abstract of judgment to correct certain fees and fines. We agree with respondent that the abstract of judgment should be corrected, but in all other respects, we affirm.
Comments on P. v. Brown