P. v. Johnson
Defendant Maurice Johnson appeals from his convictions of attempted murder, shooting at an occupied motor vehicle, assault with a firearm and possession of a firearm by a felon. He contends: (1) imposition of a Penal Code section 667.5 enhancement on two counts was error; (2) the trial court failed to state valid reasons for selecting the upper term; and (3) trial counsel was ineffective in failing to object to these two sentencing errors.[1] We affirm.
Comments on P. v. Johnson