P. v. Carlos
Appellant Jorge Humberto Carlos appeals from the judgment entered following his conviction of one count of first degree murder (Pen. Code,[1] § 187, subd. (a)), two counts of attempted willful, deliberate and premeditated murder (§§ 664, 187, subd. (a)), two counts of shooting at an occupied motor vehicle (§ 246), and one count of possession of a firearm by a felon (§ 12021, subd. (a)), with true findings on various firearm and gang enhancements (§§ 12022.53, subds. (b), (c), (d), and (e), 186.22, subd. (b)). Carlos raises the following arguments on appeal: (1) the evidence was insufficient to support one of the convictions for shooting at an occupied motor vehicle because it was based on uncorroborated accomplice testimony; (2) the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury on a witness’s status as an accomplice with CALJIC Nos. 3.16 and 3.19; (3) the trial court erred in instructing the jury on the natural and probable consequences theory of liability with CALJIC No. 3.02; and (4) there was cumulative error. We affirm.
Comments on P. v. Carlos