P. v. Callies
A jury convicted defendant Judge Callies of robbery and kidnapping to commit robbery. Defendant now contends (1) the trial court erred in instructing the jury with the last bracketed paragraph in CALCRIM No. 226 [witnesses], and (2) the abstract of judgment must be corrected to reflect a sentence of life with the possibility of parole, rather than seven years to life in prison.
We conclude there was no instructional error and the abstract of judgment correctly reflects the sentence imposed by the trial court.
We will affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Callies