P. v. Bartz
Defendant James Bartz appeals from an order converting his involuntary commitment as a mentally disordered offender (MDO) on parole to a post-parole, civil commitment and then extending it. (Pen. Code, §§ 2962, 2970, 2972.)[1] He claims the court erred in failing to advise him of his right to a jury trial, accepting counsel’s jury waiver, and conducting a bench trial.
We affirm the extension order.
Comments on P. v. Bartz