In re C.H.
C.H. appeals a judgment of the juvenile court after it sustained a juvenile wardship petition (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 602) and found he had committed second degree robbery (Pen. Code, § 211). We conclude, among other things, that: 1) substantial evidence supports the finding that C.H. used force to maintain possession of an item he stole from a market, 2) the evidence is sufficient to support the actus reus and mens rea components of robbery, and 3) there is sufficient proof in the record to identify C.H. as the perpetrator. We affirm.
Comments on In re C.H.