legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Salter v. Lerner
The motion of Carin Salter and Jennifer Segal to dismiss the appeal of Glenn Lerner from the order denying Lerner’s petition for instructions regarding the statute of limitations, etc., is GRANTED. Whether Lerner’s petition is regarded as a demurrer or a motion to dismiss based on facts not appearing on the face of the underlying petition filed by Salter and Segal, the order denying Lerner’s petition is not a “final order under Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 17200) of Part 5 of Division 9 [of the Probate Code],” made appealable by Probate Code section 1304, subdivision (a). Unlike the order from which the appeal was taken in Germino v. Hillyer (2003) 107 Cal.App.4th 951, on which Lerner relies in arguing that the present order is appealable, the present order denies Lerner’s petition, denying his request to determine that the petition by Salter and Segal is barred by the statute of limitations. The claims of Salter and Segal thus remain to be resolved. The order in Germino v. Hillyer granted a similar motion, thus finally determining that certain claims contesting the trust were barred, leaving nothing further in that respect to be determined.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale