In re Christopher M.
Appellant Charles E. challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the juvenile court’s order issued at a contested 12-month review hearing (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.21, subd. (f))[1] terminating his reunification services as to his three-year-old son, Christopher. Charles contends he substantially complied with his court-ordered services. Therefore, he further contends, the juvenile court erred in terminating rather than extending the time for him to complete them. We conclude substantial evidence supports the juvenile court’s termination order and affirm.
Comments on In re Christopher M.