P. v. Evans
Mandell Jacques Evans appeals from a judgment following a jury trial. He contends the trial court erred in imposing a “minimum†restitution fine in the amount of $240 under Penal Code section 1202.4,[1] as the minimum amount was $200 when he committed his crimes. Because appellant did not object to the amount of the restitution fine in the trial court, we conclude appellant has forfeited this argument. Accordingly, we affirm.
Comments on P. v. Evans