Scott v. Lennar
Plaintiffs[1] appeal after the trial court granted separate motions for summary judgment filed by each of the three defendants—(1) Lennar Corporation; Lennar-BVHP, LLC; Lennar Homes of California, Inc.; Lennar Associates Management, LLC; and Lennar Communities, Inc. (“Lennar”); (2) Gordon N. Ball, Inc. (“Ball”);[2] and (3) CH2M Hill (collectively “defendants”)—in plaintiffs’ tort action arising from their alleged exposure to hazardous substances in dust displaced by defendants during the grading phase of a redevelopment project. On appeal, plaintiffs challenge the trial court’s grant of summary judgment, arguing that triable issues of material fact exist regarding causation as to all claims. We shall affirm the judgments.

Comments on Scott v. Lennar

Post Reply

Search thread for Go ►

Download thread as textHTMLGo ►

• 0/5
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5

Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment: Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

Submit Advanced