Ramos Oil Co. v. Kang
In this appeal from a judgment for breach of a contract to purchase gasoline, defendants assert plaintiff Ramos Oil Co., Inc. (Ramos) has unclean hands for selling them unbranded gasoline. Defendants fail to appreciate the significance of the trial court’s two factual findings: (1) that the testimony of Ramos’s witnesses was credible and (2) that defendants requested the unbranded gasoline. Defendants also fail to understand the limited scope of appellate review. On this record, there is substantial evidence to support the trial court’s findings, the theory of unclean hands is without support, and the trial court did not abuse its discretion by awarding substantial attorney fees. We affirm.
Comments on Ramos Oil Co. v. Kang