Marriage of Stawicki
In this marital dissolution matter, Earl Stawicki appeals from a judgment after trial. He contends the superior court erred when it made two evidentiary rulings. Kellie Stawicki did not file a brief in this court.[1]
With regard to the court’s first ruling, Earl states: “On May 3, 2012, the second day of trial, Respondent’s counsel marked for identification Exhibit A . . . , Exhibit B . . . , and Exhibit C . . . . Exhibits A, B, and C were official written communications from the Internal Revenue Service, bearing the seal of the IRS. Counsel for Respondent moved the Court to allow Exhibits A through C into evidence, while counsel for Petitioner objected based on hearsay . . . . The Court sustained Petitioner’s objection . . . .” [Fn. omitted.]
The record on appeal contains no exhibits. The clerk’s transcript from the superior court, which was received by this court on October 3, 2012, contains a clerk’s note which states: “The Superior Court is not in possession of designated Respondent’s Exhibit Nos. A, B and C and all have been omitted.”

Comments on Marriage of Stawicki

Post Reply

Search thread for Go ►

Download thread as textHTMLGo ►

• 0/5
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5

Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment: Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

Submit Advanced