In re R.A.
B.A. (Mother) appeals after the juvenile court declared her five children, now 12‑year‑old R.A., 10‑year‑old N.A., eight‑year‑old M.A., four‑year‑old O.A., and two‑year‑old K.A. (collectively, the children), dependent children under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivision (b), and vested custody of the children with their father (Father). (All further statutory references are to the Welfare and Institutions Code.) Mother argues the juvenile court’s jurisdictional and dispositional orders are not supported by substantial evidence and the court erred by providing her with enhancement services instead of reunification services.
We affirm. For the reasons we will explain, substantial evidence supported the court’s orders. The court did not abuse its discretion by providing Mother with enhancement services.
Comments on In re R.A.