legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Redding
Billy Ray Redding appeals from the judgment and order committing him as a sexually violent predator (SVP) within the meaning of the Sexually Violent Predators Act. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 6600 et seq., Act or SVP Act.) He contends the SVP Act violates his right to equal protection under both the state and federal constitutions because it treats SVPs differently from those involuntarily committed for treatment as mentally disordered offenders (MDOs) and those found not guilty by reason of insanity (NGIs). He further contends the Act violates his right to due process, double jeopardy protections and the constitutional prohibitions against ex post facto laws.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale