legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Dishmon
Clifford Dishmon pled guilty to felony child abuse and admitted to inflicting great bodily injury on a child under the age of five. At the time of the plea, the court indicated it would place a seven-year "lid" on Dishmon's sentence. However, after considering Dishmon's remarks at the sentencing hearing, the court withdrew the indicated sentence and stated it intended to impose a nine-year term. The court gave Dishmon the opportunity to withdraw his guilty plea based on the new intended sentence. Dishmon declined to withdraw his plea. The court then imposed the nine-year sentence.
On appeal, Dishmon contends the trial court abused its discretion in sentencing him to nine years because it was greater than the initial seven-year-maximum indicated sentence. We reject this contention and affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale