legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re A.L.
B.M. (Mother) appeals orders of the juvenile court denying her Welfare and Institutions Code[1] section 388 petitions and orders terminating her parental rights to her two daughters, A.L. and V.S.[2]
A section 300 petition was filed as to then five-year-old A.L. in July 2011. Mother waived reunification services as to A.L., and in November 2011, the juvenile court terminated reunification services and ordered a permanency planning hearing pursuant to section 366.26 (.26 hearing). The court advised Mother that she needed to file a petition for an extraordinary writ in order to seek appellate review of the order setting the .26 hearing. The record contains no indication that Mother filed a writ petition.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale