P. v. Saenz
Defendant and appellant Juan Saenz, Jr., appeals after the trial court denied his ex parte motion for reconsideration of his restitution fine (set at $5,000), based on a claim that the trial court failed to determine his ability to pay the fine imposed, and a claim that his trial attorney was incompetent in failing to object to the restitution order amount, or to advise defendant of his right to appeal the restitution order. We affirm.
Comments on P. v. Saenz