Bautista v. State Personnel Board
Javier Bautista appeals a judgment denying his petition for writ of administrative mandate that challenged the decision of the State Personnel Board (SPB) upholding the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation’s (CDCR) determination to terminate his employment. He challenges the administrative law judge’s finding that his testimony was not credible. He further contends the evidence was insufficient to support the finding that he was dishonest for failing to report the use of force. We reject these contentions and affirm the judgment.
Comments on Bautista v. State Personnel Board