In re David H.
Denise H. (mother) appeals from the order terminating her parental rights to her son, David H., under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26.[1] Mother claims that the Alameda County Social Services Agency (the agency) failed to comply with the notice requirements of the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA). We conclude that any deficiency in the ICWA notice provided to the tribes was harmless error. Accordingly, we affirm the order terminating mother’s parental rights.
Comments on In re David H.