legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Miffin

Eric W. Miffin appeals from the judgment entered following his conviction by jury on three counts of residential burglary (Pen. Code, § 459) and one count of receiving stolen property (Pen. Code, § 496, subd. (a).)[1] On appeal, he challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the receiving stolen property count. He also contends the evidence was insufficient to support the finding of his ability to pay attorney fees. We conclude that the evidence is sufficient to support the stolen property count and that appellant forfeited his challenge to the imposition of attorney fees by failing to object in the trial court. We therefore affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale