P. v. Corral
Defendant Dylan Scott Corral appeals his conviction for making criminal threats against his girlfriend, Jessica A. He contends (1) the trial court erred in denying his motion for acquittal; (2) there was insufficient evidence to sustain his conviction; and (3) the clerk’s probation minute order reflects the incorrect court facility fee. The People concede on all three issues. We find the first two concessions improvidently given and do not accept them. There was sufficient evidence to support the conviction and the trial court did not err in denying the motion for acquittal. We agree, however, the clerk’s probation minute order does not accurately reflect the judgment orally imposed and shall order it modified. We affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Corral