P. v. Carnero
Miguel Carnero was granted probation after a jury convicted him of violating a protective order (Pen. Code, § 166, subd. (a)(4))[1] and vandalism (§ 594, subd. (a)). Carnero appeals, contending that two probation conditions lack a scienter requirement and are vague and overbroad. The trial court ordered appellant (1) not to own, use, or possess dangerous or deadly weapons including firearms or other concealable weapons, and (2) not follow, harass, molest any victim or witness in the case. We affirm. (People v. Moore (2012) 211 Cal.App.4th 1179, 1186-1188.)
Comments on P. v. Carnero