legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re Jerome G.
Appellant Jerome G. appeals from an order sustaining a petition under Welfare and Institutions Code section 602[1] and placing him home on probation. He contends the victim’s identification of him was the result of an unconstitutionally suggestive procedure, and should not have been admitted at trial. In the absence of other evidence connecting him to the crime, he claims the error was prejudicial and the order should be reversed. We find no error and affirm the court’s order.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale