legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Mann v. Brandelli
After judgment was entered in favor of respondent Michael M. Mann on his claims for legal malpractice against appellant Randolph J. Brandelli, the trial court denied Brandelli’s motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and granted in part and denied in part his motion for a new trial. In Brandelli’s prior appeal, this court affirmed the rulings on his post-judgment motions, including the grant of a new trial limited to Mann’s damages (Mann v. Brandelli (June 17, 2011, B224817) [nonpub. opn.]). Following a bench trial, the trial court awarded Mann $155,178.16 in damages. Brandelli challenges the adequacy of Mann’s showing regarding his damages at the bench trial. We reject his contentions and affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale