In re M.S.
Linda S. appeals from a January 2013 postpermanency review hearing. She contends that the juvenile court erred in not ordering six months of reunification services for her under Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.3 because additional reunification services with her youngest daughter, S.S., was the best alternative for S.S. (Undesignated statutory references are to the Welfare and Institutions Code.) We disagree. Although the juvenile court also made findings as to Linda's older daughter, M.S., Linda does not raise any issues on appeal with respect to M.S.
Comments on In re M.S.