P. v. Halgas
Harold David Halgas appeals a sentencing order after entry of a negotiated guilty plea. He contends he is entitled to conduct credits under Penal Code section 4019[1] for the 10 days he spent in a nonpenal residential substance abuse treatment program as a court-ordered condition of probation. We conclude that the issuance of conduct credits for nonpenal residential substance abuse treatment is not statutorily authorized by section 4019 and, under the circumstances presented here, is not required by equal protection. Therefore, we affirm.
Comments on P. v. Halgas