legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P v. Almendarez
A jury found defendant and appellant Sean David Almendarez guilty of receiving stolen property. (Pen. Code, § 496, subd. (a).)[1] The trial court found true the allegations that defendant suffered: (1) two prior strike convictions (§§ 1170.12, subds. (a)-(d), 667, subds. (b)-(i)); and (2) five prior convictions for which he served prison terms (§ 667.5, subd. (b)). The trial court sentenced defendant to prison for a term of 11 years. Defendant raises two issues on appeal. First, defendant contends the trial court erred by not instructing the jury on the law of specific intent. Second, defendant asserts the trial court erred by excluding evidence relating to the location of some of the stolen goods. We affirm the judgment.[2

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale