Overland v. Scheper Kim & Harris
A former partner in a four-partner law firm argues that upon dissociating he was entitled to a payout of 25 percent of the firm’s value pursuant to Corporations Code section 16701.[1] We find that the trial court did not err by determining plaintiff’s share in the partnership to be 4 percent. We also find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by awarding plaintiff less in attorney fees than he requested.
Comments on Overland v. Scheper Kim & Harris