In re M.G.
Defendant and appellant R.G. (Father) appeals from the juvenile court’s jurisdictional and dispositional findings as to his six-year-old son M.G. He contends that (1) there was insufficient evidence to support the court’s order sustaining the petition as to him under Welfare and Institutions Code section 300, subdivision (b); and (2) the court erred in removing M.G. from his custody. We reject these contentions and affirm the judgment.
Comments on In re M.G.