In re I.M.
A.M. (mother) appeals from an order terminating parental rights to her preschool-aged son I.M. (sometimes child). She argues that the juvenile court should have applied the “beneficial parental relationship†exception to termination. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26, subd. (c)(1)(B)(i).) She also appeals from an order made at the same hearing denying her “changed circumstances†petition pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 (section 388). We find no error. Hence, we will affirm.
Comments on In re I.M.