P. v. Garcia
Appellant, Ronnie Neil Garcia, pled no contest to residential robbery (Pen. Code, § 212.5, subd. (a))[1] and admitted a personal use of a firearm enhancement (§ 12022.5, subd. (a)).
On appeal, Garcia contends: 1) the court abused its discretion when it denied his motion to withdraw plea; and 2) the imposition of a $240 restitution fine violates ex post facto principles.[2] We will find merit to this last contention and modify the judgment accordingly. In all other respects, we affirm.
Comments on P. v. Garcia