In re J.B.
In this dependency case (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 300),[1] B.B. (mother) appeals from the jurisdictional and dispositional orders regarding her son, J.B. (the child). Mother contends (1) the juvenile court erred by failing to evaluate her competency and the need to appoint a guardian ad litem, and (2) the notice of the hearing failed to comply with the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) (25 U.S.C., § 1901 et seq.) and California law. We reverse for the limited purpose of ensuring adequate notice as prescribed by law.
Comments on In re J.B.