P. v. Zwick
Loren Michael Zwick filed a timely appeal from convictions for first degree burglary and grand theft following a jury trial. The trial court also found him in violation of probation and sentenced him to the low term of two years for the burglary and a one-year consecutive term for the violation of probation. Sentence for grand theft was stayed pursuant to Penal Code section 654.[1]
We appointed counsel to represent Zwick on appeal. Counsel filed a brief that set forth the procedural history and facts of the case with citations to the record in accordance with Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 and People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. Counsel did not argue against the client, but advised the court no issues were found to argue on Zwick’s behalf, although counsel identified five potential claims for our consideration. Zwick was given 30 days to file written argument on his behalf. He did so, but not within the time period given. In any event, we have considered each of the points raised and find none persuasive. The judgment is therefore affirmed.
Comments on P. v. Zwick