P. v. Sardinha
Defendant Joshua Sardinha appeals from his conviction of two counts of second degree robbery (Pen. Code, § 211; counts 1 & 2), two counts of assault (§ 245, subd. (a)(1), (2); counts 3 & 4), and the associated firearm enhancements (§§ 12022.53, subd. (b), 667.5, subd. (c), 1192.7, subd. (c) & 12022.5). Defendant contends the trial court erroneously admitted evidence of an uncharged crime, and, alternatively, failed to instruct the jury on the limited permissible use of this evidence. He contends the errors amount to a constitutional violation of his due process rights by rendering his trial fundamentally unfair. Finding no merit in any of defendant’s contentions, we affirm.
Comments on P. v. Sardinha